BLOG

See the latest news and insights around Information Governance, eDiscovery, Enterprise Collaboration, and Social Media. 

All Posts

How Technology Pricing Models Are Penalizing Government Organizations for Social Media Success

When it comes to social media and website archiving solutions for government organizations, pricing models can be rather nebulous. This is not an accident. Many archiving vendors use a strategy of charging a low fee for a small number of records, so initial prices seem very reasonable, but as soon as social media channels gain traction and see success, the organization suddenly finds itself being charged a lot more because of all the records created. Therefore, the more successful the social media channel, the higher the price over time.  How do government organizations budget for this variable? Well, unlimited record models provide budget certainty and don’t penalize agencies for the increased popularity of social media channels.

Why the Number of Records Is Important

An increase in social media activity should be considered a success, not a liability. But increased activity means increased records, which leads to higher charges when pricing models are based around number of records.

How Technology Pricing Models Are Penalizing Government Organizations for Social Media Success

Whenever we speak to new and potential government organizations at the state, city, or local level about their biggest social media archiving frustrations, they inevitably bring up this challenge of record limitations. The fact of the matter is, they often underestimate the number of records their websites and social media accounts will be generating—and vendors bank on this fact.

A mid-tier solution might (in addition to providing unlimited social media accounts and data storage) offer around 2,500 new records per month. This sounds like a lot, but when you consider what constitutes a “record”, you realize that it isn’t nearly as much as it sounds at first. If a social media account is being archived in real time, every change results in the creation of a new record. This includes not only new posts and comments, but also likes, unlikes, reactions, and deleted comments. If a government organization is managing several busy accounts across multiple social media platforms, even a high monthly record limit can quickly be exceeded—which results in additional charges.

Organizations Shouldn’t Be Penalized for Success

Government organizations are required to preserve social media data for compliance purposes, and thanks to the abovementioned pricing structure, this can become a very expensive and unpredictable situation if their social media accounts see lots of social engagement.

At PageFreezer, we don’t believe that agencies should be punished for having successful social media campaigns. Active online engagement with the public should be encouraged, and that means providing a pricing structure that doesn’t place a limit on records. PageFreezer offers unlimited records so that agencies never need to face budget uncertainty or worry about how many records they’re creating, but can instead focus on having meaningful conversations with constituents.

Additionally, we believe in making Open Records compliance and transparency as simple as possible, which is why we provide a public portal that allows agencies to share archived social media data with constituents on demand. The portal can be accessed through any web browser or mobile media device, provides keyword search, and lets a user export content in PDF.

If you’re in the market for a social media archiving solution, ask yourself exactly why pricing is structured in the way that it is before settling on a product. And make sure that there are no hidden fees, or that you won’t suddenly face a steep price increase.

Visit our government webpage for more information, or read our blog to find out why we were chosen by the National Archives & Records Administration for all social media archiving. You can also have a look at our social media archiving product page, or simply request a demo to experience it for yourself.   

 

George van Rooyen
George van Rooyen
George van Rooyen is a Senior Copywriter at PageFreezer.

Related Posts

How Schools Can Manage Official Social Media Accounts and Protect Student Privacy

With many schools boasting large and active communities, it’s unsurprising that social media has become a  popular tool in education. Social media platforms offer an engaging way to share information and connect students, parents, and teachers. A Facebook page or Twitter account makes it easy to inform everyone that school has been closed because of snow, remind parents of important upcoming events, or simply celebrate the latest team win. 

The Best Way to Place Social Media Data on Litigation Hold

With so many people active on social media these days, it’s hardly surprising that posts and comments on platforms like Facebook and Twitter often feature prominently during legal matters. This means that legal professionals have an obligation to protect relevant social media data from spoliation, but the challenges that come with these modern information sources extend far beyond willful destruction of evidence.

Social Media Evidence Spoliation and Preservation

No case better illustrates the risks of social media spoliation than Lester v. Allied Concrete Company. The plaintiff had lost his wife in a tragic vehicle accident and was suing for wrongful death. Unfortunately, some Facebook photos came to light that his lawyer was afraid would prejudice the case, and he consequently told his client to delete them. “We do not want blow ups of other pics at trial,” an email from the law firm read, “so please, please clean up your Facebook and MySpace!”